Topical debate, moral dilemmas and quirky questions. Join fellow shareholders in civilised discussions of issues of interest
-
gle1975
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:43 am
- Has thanked: 98 times
- Been thanked: 126 times
-
Contact:
Post
by gle1975 » Tue May 28, 2019 2:37 pm
I voted for then Brexit Party, but would not mind a Norway/EEA option.
-
pabenny
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:21 pm
- Has thanked: 536 times
- Been thanked: 1532 times
-
Contact:
Post
by pabenny » Tue May 28, 2019 2:58 pm
As I understand it, Norway:
- has full access to the Single Market. This requires regulatory alignment with the EU but gives no formal role in setting those regulations
- has free movement of people with the EU
- pays into the EU budget – but receives nothing back such as regional aid, farm subsidies
- does not participate in the Common Fisheries Policy or Common Agricultural policy.
Fishing and agriculture aside, I’m not clear how a ‘Norway-style’ relationship would differ from full membership.
-
expressman33
- Posts: 11123
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:36 pm
- Location: stockport
- Has thanked: 2703 times
- Been thanked: 10204 times
-
Contact:
Post
by expressman33 » Tue May 28, 2019 3:10 pm
pabenny wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 2:58 pm
As I understand it, Norway:
- has full access to the Single Market. This requires regulatory alignment with the EU but gives no formal role in setting those regulations
- has free movement of people with the EU
- pays into the EU budget – but receives nothing back such as regional aid, farm subsidies
- does not participate in the Common Fisheries Policy or Common Agricultural policy.
Fishing and agriculture aside, I’m not clear how a ‘Norway-style’ relationship would differ from full membership.
Makes you wonder why Norway doesn't apply for full membership
-
Richard Frost
- Posts: 11339
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: The Isle of Dreams
- Has thanked: 2462 times
- Been thanked: 5476 times
-
Contact:
Post
by Richard Frost » Tue May 28, 2019 4:09 pm
expressman33 wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 3:10 pm
pabenny wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 2:58 pm
As I understand it, Norway:
- has full access to the Single Market. This requires regulatory alignment with the EU but gives no formal role in setting those regulations
- has free movement of people with the EU
- pays into the EU budget – but receives nothing back such as regional aid, farm subsidies
- does not participate in the Common Fisheries Policy or Common Agricultural policy.
Fishing and agriculture aside, I’m not clear how a ‘Norway-style’ relationship would differ from full membership.
Makes you wonder why Norway doesn't apply for full membership
Being Norway and its traditional fishing industry, I suspect they did not want to give that up.
-
kevinchess1
- Posts: 23303
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:02 pm
- Location: Miles away from the sea
- Has thanked: 12164 times
- Been thanked: 16544 times
-
Contact:
Post
by kevinchess1 » Tue May 28, 2019 9:58 pm
What's the difference between Change UK and a toilet?
A toilet has got a seat!
Politically incorrect since 69
-
Chadwick
- Posts: 2073
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 4:21 pm
- Has thanked: 1006 times
- Been thanked: 2218 times
-
Contact:
Post
by Chadwick » Tue May 28, 2019 10:08 pm
gle1975 wrote: ↑Tue May 28, 2019 2:37 pm
I voted for then Brexit Party, but would not mind a Norway/EEA option.
On the face of it, they are two mutually incompatible positions.
Out of genuine interest, would you like a second referendum where you could make your preference known?
-
blythburgh
- Posts: 15983
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:14 pm
- Location: The Far East
- Has thanked: 29891 times
- Been thanked: 5762 times
-
Contact:
Post
by blythburgh » Wed May 29, 2019 9:27 am
I can see where gle1975 is coming from. They want out so voted for the party that is 100% behind that.
I would settle for the Norway option but much prefer to stay in. Norway option is better than being out but a very poor option.
Keep smiling because the light at the end of someone's tunnel may be you, Ron Cheneler
-
blythburgh
- Posts: 15983
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:14 pm
- Location: The Far East
- Has thanked: 29891 times
- Been thanked: 5762 times
-
Contact:
Post
by blythburgh » Wed May 29, 2019 9:30 am
How do people feel about Alistair Campbell being kicked out of the Labour Party. OK he made a tactical decision to make a one off non Labour vote so he could stand by his beliefs.
But holocaust denier members and those who have made anti semitic posts online are merely suspended.
Looks more like get rid of those who are not hard left Momentum aka Militant members that a democratic decision.
Keep smiling because the light at the end of someone's tunnel may be you, Ron Cheneler
-
Richard Frost
- Posts: 11339
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: The Isle of Dreams
- Has thanked: 2462 times
- Been thanked: 5476 times
-
Contact:
Post
by Richard Frost » Wed May 29, 2019 9:42 am
He admitted/volunteered the info on national TV = Case proved, Instant removal, no investigation
Others suspended for investigation followed by removal where proved. Investigation sometimes takes time where evidence is gathered etc.
Where is the issue?
-
blythburgh
- Posts: 15983
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 7:14 pm
- Location: The Far East
- Has thanked: 29891 times
- Been thanked: 5762 times
-
Contact:
Post
by blythburgh » Wed May 29, 2019 10:03 am
The issue is how some who are not Momemtum/Militant supporters get treated in comparison to those who are
Keep smiling because the light at the end of someone's tunnel may be you, Ron Cheneler
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest