Topical debate, moral dilemmas and quirky questions. Join fellow shareholders in civilised discussions of issues of interest
-
expressman33
- Posts: 12468
- Joined: Tue Jun 29 2010 10:36pm
- Location: stockport
- Has thanked: 3006 times
- Been thanked: 10641 times
-
Contact:
Post
by expressman33 » Fri Dec 20 2019 9:12pm
macliam wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20 2019 6:17pm
"She is the primary carer for the three children"
Should primary carers be exempt from going to prison ?
-
macliam
- Posts: 11233
- Joined: Thu Jul 18 2013 12:26pm
- Location: By the Deben, Suffolk
- Has thanked: 1630 times
- Been thanked: 9291 times
-
Contact:
Post
by macliam » Fri Dec 20 2019 9:44pm
expressman33 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20 2019 9:12pm
macliam wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20 2019 6:17pm
"She is the primary carer for the three children"
Should primary carers be exempt from going to prison ?
macliam wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20 2019 6:17pm
The judge appears to have decided that imprisoning the primary carer of three (soon to be four) children was not in the public interest. That is a decision he is paid to make and I'm not going to second-guess him.
Just because I'm paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not out to get me
-
blythburgh
- Posts: 17757
- Joined: Tue Jun 29 2010 7:14pm
- Location: The Far East
- Has thanked: 35044 times
- Been thanked: 6110 times
-
Contact:
Post
by blythburgh » Sat Dec 21 2019 10:01am
expressman33 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20 2019 9:12pm
macliam wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20 2019 6:17pm
"She is the primary carer for the three children"
Should primary carers be exempt from going to prison ?
Depends on the crime and the evidence and what the judge hears from everyone concerned. But the children could end up in care. A broken family and all that means to the children.
Keep smiling because the light at the end of someone's tunnel may be you, Ron Cheneler
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests